To follow-up the topic we explored in our most recent post here at the site, and our most recent podcast at Podomatic, we would like to draw your attention to two items. First, we have this news story from Oakland, which gives us another example of how the agents of the state – who are paid via forced payments of taxation (aka statutory theft) — cannot be everywhere to protect you, and have been shown to NOT defend people and not have a “legal duty” to do so according to their own courts. Take a look at this story, which ties in to the pod from 8-20-14. http://sanfrancisco.cbslocal.com/2014/08/20/oakland-liquor-store-clerks-fight-back-against-alleged-repeat-thief/

And here is an overview of court cases in which agents of the state to which people are forced to pay have determined that the state has no legal responsibility to protect those very people forced to pay for it. This shows us that the entire rationale offered for the existence of the state (i.e. to protect people from aggression) is not only a fraud, it is a smokescreen used to allow agents of the state to steal. 

Take a look: Court Cases on “Duty” to Protect Not Being a Duty At All

Thanks for reading! Spread the word about the podcast! Lots more to come!